Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:32:33 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 07:58:47, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 09, 2000 at 22:51:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I let crafty chug for a while after Qe7, and it likes e5, with a score that >>is not much different from the Kh1 score. IE it doesn't see any loss of >>material that It reports... this was through depth=12... >> >>Here is the 13 ply output: >> >> 13 10:54 -1.39 39. ... e5 40. Rh4 e4 41. Bb6 Qf6 42. >> Bxd8 Rxd8 43. Qxf6 gxf6 44. Kf2 Rc8 >> 45. Re2 Nf5 46. Rg4+ Kh7 > > >this only shows IMO that crafty is a little old-fahioned. >Buy hiarcs or cstal or gambit-tiger if you want to find out >about the position. as i said: > >old paradigm programs have no idea how to evaluate chaos. I notice your list of "new-paradigm" programs is growing. When does it subsume _all_ of the programs? >you can forget them in those positions. > >the only reason hiarcs or cstal are not killing anybody is: they are >both outsearched. but for analysis, this works cause there they >get enough time. > >try to defend (the lost position and the lost old paradigm). > >i know: you know the earth is a disk. i will not be able to convince you >it isn't. That is maybe your problem. If you only watch TV, you might be convinced it is just a disc. If you dive in and do _research_ you find the _truth_. note that hand-waving is _not_ research...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.