Author: Michael Neish
Date: 08:28:10 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
>>>old paradigm programs have no idea how to evaluate chaos. I'm wondering about this comment, which has cropped up in different forms a few times in the last day or two. Could you please explain why chaotic Chess should necessarily be any better than stable or ordered Chess? Some positions are quiet whatever you do, and intentionally destabilising them for the sake of creating a situation that conventional programs can't handle can easily backfire, especially if your program is tactically weaker. By the way, by your tone it seems that you believe others are incapable of understanding your ideas. Actually, I suspect they're pretty obvious to anyone; people are just according them the skepticism that should be given to anything that challenges conventional wisdom, and until you prove your case irrefutably with real, consistent results, not just strong words and claims, you have no hope of bringing the masses round to your view. Mike.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.