Author: pavel
Date: 08:52:27 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 10:33:36, Jeroen van Dorp wrote:
>Gambit Tiger is indeed fun to play.
>I disabled book (yes, I know, I shouldn't) and ended up with this game in which
>it immediately goes for a gambit indeed.
>It is a blitz 10' game, in which I'm very bad, but I noticed some moves where I
>think Gambit's play really is va banque.
>
>It bluffed me off, though.
>
>A game with some annotations as lousy as my moves.
>
>[Event ""]
>[Site ""]
>[Date "2000.11.10"]
>[Round ""]
>[White "Jeroen I.M. van Dorp"]
>[Black "Gambit Tiger 1.0"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[Opening "B01 Scandinavian Defense"]
>
>
>1.e4 d5 { without opening book choosing for Scandinavian} 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qe6+
>4.Qe2 g6 5.Qxe6 { going for a draw. Hah.} 5...Bxe6 6.d4 Nc6 7.Nf3 ( 7.d5 { later
>on I thought that this might be a good one after all.} 7...Nb4 8.dxe6 Nxc2+
>9.Kd1 Nxa1 10.exf7+ Kxf7 11.Bd2 { trying to lock in the knight on a1 } 11...Bh6
>12.Bxh6 Nxh6 13.Kc1 ) 7...Nb4 8.Kd1 O-O-O 9.Be3 Bf5 10.Rc1 c5 { Bah. Where did I
>go wrong.}11.Bd2 cxd4 12.Nb5 Nc6 13.Ng5 Nh6 14.Bc4 e6 15.f3 { aimed at g4}
>15...a6 16.Na3 b5 17.Bb3 d3 { pushing through, making a Houdini act for the
>bishop at f5. Is chess that simple?} 18.g4 dxc2+ 19.Bxc2 Bb4 20.Nb1 Rxd2+
>21.Nxd2 Rd8 22.Bd3 Bxd3 23.Rxc6+ Kb8 24.Rxa6 { That must be a wrong one.}
>24...Bb1 25.Rb6+ { Ouch again. I should have made that pin disappear } ( 25.Kc1
>Bxd2+ 26.Kxb1 Bxg5 27.Rb6+ Kc7 28.Rxb5 { and maybe not so bad after all. } )
>25...Kc7 26.Rxb5 Bxd2 27.Ne4 Bf4+ 28.Ke1 Nxg4 29.fxg4 { Ever thought of giving
>up?} 29...Bxe4 30.Rc5+ { Yeah, right. } 30...Kb6 0-1
>
>
>Jeroen ;-}
the annotations itself were more entertaining then the game...
Bravo,
pavs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.