Author: Joe Besogn
Date: 10:00:51 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 12:54:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 10, 2000 at 12:24:35, Joe Besogn wrote: > >>Come, come now. It's very easy. You just make a few attacks here and there and >>have a secret agenda. > >That's a pity. I don't have an agenda. Any ideas? Good one !!! Throw it back at them. You're learning fast. > >>You're doing very well apart from the odd mistake. Attack >>the strong and powerful rather than the small and weak. > >Attacking according to stature is a nice thought, but not when you end up >supporting the feeble minded. Another great one. Get a little dig in on the usual target, just in passing. > Stature is irrelevant if you can support your >belief by valid arguments. > >>Robin Hood rather than >>Little Hamlet. If you know what I mean. > >I've always thougt it was Little John. Then the ambiguity. Not bad, but open to: "I always thought you were the fat monk with the stick" Also, it's better to open the picture-metaphors yourself, rather than rely on trying to turn someone else's. So not a bad post in the CW vein. I give you C+, Little Hamlet. Must try harder. > >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.