Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 15:03:01 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 13:00:51, Joe Besogn wrote: >On November 10, 2000 at 12:54:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On November 10, 2000 at 12:24:35, Joe Besogn wrote: >> >>>Come, come now. It's very easy. You just make a few attacks here and there and >>>have a secret agenda. >> >>That's a pity. I don't have an agenda. Any ideas? > >Good one !!! Throw it back at them. You're learning fast. > >> >>>You're doing very well apart from the odd mistake. Attack >>>the strong and powerful rather than the small and weak. >> >>Attacking according to stature is a nice thought, but not when you end up >>supporting the feeble minded. > >Another great one. Get a little dig in on the usual target, just in passing. > >> Stature is irrelevant if you can support your >>belief by valid arguments. >> >>>Robin Hood rather than >>>Little Hamlet. If you know what I mean. >> >>I've always thougt it was Little John. > >Then the ambiguity. Not bad, but open to: "I always thought you were the fat >monk with the stick" > >Also, it's better to open the picture-metaphors yourself, rather than rely on >trying to turn someone else's. > >So not a bad post in the CW vein. I give you C+, Little Hamlet. Must try harder. > > What the f*ck is this?? Why is CCC filled with annoying morons all of a sudden?? Go away, please.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.