Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 19:30:32 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 10:43:32, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>the position after Kh1 is IMO also lost. >That doesn't exactly contribute to your high opinion about GT. Not being able to >decide the game, depsite it not being blitz. it won. thats enough. it can decide itself where to win against crafty. >My point was that the time issue is irrelevant. If given enough time then you >can find better movers for Crafty and GT long before move 39. you can give crafty time as you want, if you give the same time to gambit-tiger it will kill crafty. crafty searches the wrong positions because it has the wrong score. >It was nonsense and you know it very well. You got stranded in off topic land >like a beached whale. A smokescreen is probably the correct term. i have no idea what you are talking ... >GT is based with minor alterations on Chess Tiger 13.0. > So "new paradigm" >doesn't make sense since Chess Tiger isn't different from other knowledge >propelled bean counters. you are blind mogens. i cannot help you. make the light on in denmark. its dark again. winter. >Adding specific knowledge and tuning evaluation isn't a >new paradigm, no matter how hard you try to stretch the definition. you don't even understand what the new paradigm is about. >If I'm a cheerleader then you're a groupie and my uniform is much nicer. sure. >Mogens. auch morgen.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.