Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:52:55 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 21:50:45, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On November 10, 2000 at 21:00:26, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>I think it has finished higher in computer competitions than any program that
>>you have written.
>
>aha. now the discussion has reached a new "level" !
>
>[Event "Computer chess game"]
>[Site "60/60"]
>[Date "2000.11.11"]
>[Round "2"]
>[White "crafty17.13"]
>[Black "Gambit-Tiger"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[TimeControl "60/3600"]
>
>1. a3 a6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e3 Bf5 4. Be2 e6 5. O-O Bd6 6. d3 h6 7. c4 dxc4 8.
>dxc4 Nc6 9. Qb3 Nf6 10. Nh4 Bh7 11. Bf3 Ne4 12. g3 Nc5 13. Qc3 O-O 14. Bxc6
>bxc6 15. Nd2 Be7 16. Nhf3 Bf6 17. Nd4 Qd7 18. Qa5 Nd3 19. N2b3 e5 20. Nf3
>Qh3 21. Nfd2 e4 22. Nd4 Rae8 23. Qxa6 Re5 24. Rd1 Rh5 25. Nf1 Ne5 26. Qxc6
>Nxc6 27. Nxc6 Bf5 28. Rd5 Bg4 29. Rxh5 Bxh5 30. Ne7+ Bxe7 31. g4 Bxg4 32.
>Nd2 Bf3 33. Nxf3
>{White resigns} 0-1
>
>bob gets enthusiastic with relating crafty's score to gambit-tigers score.
>oh - nothing easier than that. take the above game and right down
>(on the RIGHT side of course) whats crafty scoring.
>
>I will tell you then on the LEFT side whats the score of gambit-tiger.
Do you know the meaning of "living vicariously"? Look it up, because
you are doing it. as in "living vicariously through gambit tiger or CSTal"
or "living vicariously through Christophe".
Either way is no way to live. Much better to live "as yourself".
>
>then we look at the result of the game, and correlate...
>
>this time again the opening ?!
>or maybe the fact that gambit-tiger has inaccurate scores ?!
>inflating evaluations ?
>
>
>
>>Perhaps you should write a program.
>
>
>perhabs bob should consider that he is not the only guy on earth who
>is able to write a chess program.
>i don't want to write a chess program. if it makes THIS out of the people,
>i better stay to working on cars or reading books or
>beeing with family.
>
>continue your good work. don't give up.
>8 cpu's can do better than 1.
>
>
>>Everyone who can program should write one, it's fun. And even if the program
>>plays like crap, get it going on ICC.
>
>what is ICC ? never heard of.
>
>>Weak programs are a whole bunch of fun
>>for humans to play.
>
>>bruce
>
>were you able to find out whom you have elected ?
>do you want my vote too ? i am from foreign country...
>
>maybe my vote is the one that decides... :-)))
>
>or maybe it was too complicate ... voting is not easy :-)))
>
>maybe it was not sex, just helping clinton to get away some pressure.
>
>americans. ha - very funny people. first we had to discuss the
>clinton-babe and "was it sex or not" and now the whole world
>has another new american comedy to laugh. this time another
>glorius episode of al bundy's : do you count my vote too ?
>
>i am sure this serial gets continued.
>
>next season.
>
>i wonder if whole america isn't real but a serial. not real but
>a kind of ellen degeneres comedy. and the presidents are the main actors.
>oh - forgot, we had this cowboy, who today has problems to remember who
>he is... how was the name of THIS episode ? Bonanza ? shiloh ranch ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.