Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:08:00 11/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2000 at 04:05:15, Uri Blass wrote: >[D]3r2k1/5p1p/p2p1Q2/1p2pN1P/4p1P1/1b3P2/1q6/3RK1R1 b - - 0 1 > >Gandalf see a small positive evaluation for black in this position and has >terrible function at depth 9. I meant branching factor and not function >The branching factor is clearly more than 10. > >Crafty has also terrible branching factor and the only difference is that the >big branching factor is at depth 11 and that the evaluation is 0.00 and not >positive for black. <snipped> >It did not see a new evaluation at depth 9 after more than 25 minutes on my >pIII450 It is Gandalf in this case.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.