Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: For Bruce: Crafty vs. Gambit-Tiger 1.a3 a6

Author: Jason Williamson

Date: 02:53:56 11/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 2000 at 21:57:19, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On November 10, 2000 at 21:54:04, pavel wrote:
>>I have one question for thorsten....
>
>brilliant.
>
>>"whats the point you want to prove?"
>
>gambit-tiger has completely different evaluation than crafty.
>and it wins although crafty has the "accurate" score !
>relate the scores of both programs in this game.
>
>>comparing GT vs crafty is kinda irritating.
>
>why ? crafty is old paradigm, GT is new paradigm.
>
>it works. new paradigm beats old paradigm.
>no matter how the opening is.


What are you babbleing about?  Is Junior or Fritz old paradigm?  If so, then
show that GT is clearly better then those.  Its well known that Crafty is not in
the same league as the major commercials, especially on equal hardware, since
thats not Dr. Hyatt's real focus.

Of course, since this really is nothing more then a personal battle between you
and Dr. Hyatt, it was really no point in posting this, since you will most
likely just ignore it.

JW



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.