Author: Chessfun
Date: 05:16:29 11/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2000 at 08:01:29, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 10, 2000 at 23:46:05, Chessfun wrote: >>>pardon ? >>>the idea was to play an opening that is symmetrical. >>>the reason was to eliminate the excuse of bob that the opening was >>>the reason crafty lost this time. >>I don't recall in the original game posted that Dr. Hyatt made >>any such excuse or reason. >but i do remember that it was said: the opening was a winning position >for gambit-tiger. this game the opening is excluded from the game. >i don't remeber in which post it was said, but i remember it. Then you should have checked prior to posting as being accurate would be good. The posts you were responding to were from Bruce. http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?137526 http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?137518 Either/or but I don't think neither support the use of the word "excuse" in your original post. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.