Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: For Bruce: Crafty vs. Gambit-Tiger 1.a3 a6

Author: Hermano Ecuadoriano

Date: 08:53:16 11/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 11, 2000 at 09:35:06, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 11, 2000 at 08:24:24, Thorsten Czub wrote:
><snipped>
>>the hiarcs of today is the result.
>>a knowledge based program, the version 7.32 gets normally outsearchered by the
>>latest fritz and junior programs. but hiarcs is still
>>very good.
>
>I disagree here.
>
>I do not think that Junior outsearches Hiarcs at tournament time control.
>I believe that one of the main problems of hiarcs is the hash tables bug.

I didn't know about a bug.
Would you please describe it?
Do you know if the author is fixing it?

>
>I expect hiarcs to have big problems on 1Ghz machine because of it.
>
>>if you use it on a 1 Ghz machine, it can really be a good tool.
>
>I am not sure about it.
>I think that hiarcs branching factor is bigger in longer time control and it can
>be outsearched if you give it fast hardware.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.