Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:36:02 11/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2000 at 14:20:29, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 11, 2000 at 10:11:45, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>Hiarcs 7.32 is one of the engines that benefits the least from faster >>processors, as you can see in the SSDF list if you compare ratings on the AMD >>450 and the P200MMX. So on a 1 Ghz machine it will do worse than on a P200, >>compared to other engines. >> >>Besides, Hiarcs has nothing in common with the absurdly called "new paradigm", >>but neither do Constellation, Mchess or Gambit. >> >>Enrique > >wrong - if something is absurd than your comment. I found that Hiarcs has problems in long time control because of the hash table bug. I do not see something absurd in the claim that hiarcs has problems in long time control because of this bug. I also do not think that Hiarcs is part of what you described as the "new paradigm". I remember that you posted games when hiarcs lost against tal because of king attack problems. I do not think that Hiarcs has big king attack scores relative to other programs. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.