Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 12:05:46 11/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2000 at 14:36:02, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 11, 2000 at 14:20:29, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On November 11, 2000 at 10:11:45, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>Hiarcs 7.32 is one of the engines that benefits the least from faster >>>processors, as you can see in the SSDF list if you compare ratings on the AMD >>>450 and the P200MMX. So on a 1 Ghz machine it will do worse than on a P200, >>>compared to other engines. >>> >>>Besides, Hiarcs has nothing in common with the absurdly called "new paradigm", >>>but neither do Constellation, Mchess or Gambit. >>> >>>Enrique >> >>wrong - if something is absurd than your comment. > >I found that Hiarcs has problems in long time control because of the hash table >bug. > >I do not see something absurd in the claim that hiarcs has problems in long time >control because of this bug. > >I also do not think that Hiarcs is part of what you described as the "new >paradigm". >I remember that you posted games when hiarcs lost against tal because of king >attack problems. >I do not think that Hiarcs has big king attack scores relative to other >programs. > >Uri The contrary. It has been said and proven many times that one of Hiarc's shortcomings is its king safety code. Enrique
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.