Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A good scacrifice that gambit has no problem to see

Author: Howard Exner

Date: 15:36:25 11/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 11, 2000 at 00:59:55, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 10, 2000 at 21:48:17, Howard Exner wrote:
>
>>How did that game continue? Do you have the pgn for it? I recall the black
>>kingside pawns rolling forward, attacking the pinned knight on f3.
>
>I have the game from the relevant position in my book.
>I am sure I have a pgn of it but I do not rmember the name of the file that this
>game is included in and I am too lazy to look for it now.
>
>
>The game continued 21...Qd5 22.Bxe8 Rxe8 23.Kg2 Nc4 24.Bc1 g5 25.h3 h5 26.g4 e5
>27.Qd1 f5 28.gxf5 g4 29.hxg4 fxg4 30.Kg1 Qxf3 31.Qxf3 Bxf3 32.Bh6 Kh7
>33.Bd2 Rf8 34.Rxe5 Nxe5 Re1 Nc6 0-1.

Thanks, that was what I was looking for. The move 23 ... Nc4 is important for
computers to have in their eval if they are to play Qd5. Some posted lines with
Nb3 in stead of c4. Nb3 I believe is a mistake so they would be playing Qd5 for
the wrong reasons if Nc4 is missing in their calculations.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.