Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 17:12:11 11/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2000 at 18:33:52, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 11, 2000 at 18:20:25, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On November 11, 2000 at 14:36:02, Uri Blass wrote: >>>I do not think that Hiarcs has big king attack scores relative to other >>>programs. >>> >>>Uri >> >>wrong > >I think that your impression of bigger scores of hiarcs may be because of the >fact that hiarcs has bigger scores in general than other programs. > >Here is an example that is not about king attack but about endgame: > >[D]8/2n4r/p1k1p3/PpPp1p2/1R1P1PpP/1P1R2P1/8/5K2 w - - 0 1 > >This position is from one of the games between Fritz6a and Nemeth Eduard > >Fritz6a evaluated this dead draw as +2.94 for white and Hiarcs7.32 can see +4.39 >pawns for white. > >This is not because Fritz is smarter than Hiarcs but because of the fact that +2 >of Hiarcs is not identical to +2 of Fritz. > >Uri I see this all the time in games with my engine vs Crafty. For example in some drawn endings mine will say +2 and Crafty will say +1. Some engines contain a term that's supposed to induce them to trade down when ahead material, I think. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.