Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:56:01 11/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2000 at 01:32:22, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 11, 2000 at 18:36:22, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 11, 2000 at 18:22:44, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>wrong >> >>I remember that you were one of the people who proved that hiarcs has king >>safety problems by posting games that hiarcs7.32 lost against chess system tal >>by king attack. >> >>Uri > >in relation to cstal (!) yes. >but in relation to other programs this was not that much. I remember also games of enrique(40/40 on p400) when hiarcs7 lost against Junior5 because of king safety. > >its relative. >hiarcs has a lot of knowledge. >its a slow searcher. >running on my 950 Mhz it seems to recover from the problems of beeing >too slow.... I used programs for anlysis at long time control and I found the problem of big branching factor mainly with hiarcs. I usually do not see it with other programs like Junior or Gandalf or Tiger. I did not do statistics about but I believe that hiarcs has bigger branching factor at long time control when I found no problem with the branching factor of hiarcs in the first minutes and the problem was only later. conclusion:I guess that fast processors are not going to help hiarcs even without the hash tables bug. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.