Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 00:04:44 11/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2000 at 19:56:41, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>
>>I would like to merge the two into one, stronger, entity.
>>
>>I would also like to build a polymorphic program which changes its playing style
>>constantly, seldomly play two games in the same way, and still play very strong.
>>
>>This would (help to) solve a number of issues that current chess programs do not
>>really address, like avoiding that the opponent understands your style and set
>>traps according to this knowledge.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>
>So, next year, GT and CT will be one, and polymorphic another one?!!!!!
I have no idea of what I will provide next year. There are several research
directions I will investigate, and after all there are still 365 days of work
before "next year".
>Anyway it's a great discussion! I wonder if there there is such a thing as
>perfect chess. If there is, will it look very interesting, or does anything
>extremely interesting normally involve weakness of some kind?
>
> This is a question which REALLY interests me!
Unless your opponents are all perfect, imperfection in your play is still
allowed. That means a lot of room for style variations.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.