Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 03:20:24 11/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2000 at 03:19:33, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 11, 2000 at 20:12:11, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >> >>On November 11, 2000 at 18:33:52, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 11, 2000 at 18:20:25, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>On November 11, 2000 at 14:36:02, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>I do not think that Hiarcs has big king attack scores relative to other >>>>>programs. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>wrong >>> >>>I think that your impression of bigger scores of hiarcs may be because of the >>>fact that hiarcs has bigger scores in general than other programs. >>> >>>Here is an example that is not about king attack but about endgame: >>> >>>[D]8/2n4r/p1k1p3/PpPp1p2/1R1P1PpP/1P1R2P1/8/5K2 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>This position is from one of the games between Fritz6a and Nemeth Eduard >>> >>>Fritz6a evaluated this dead draw as +2.94 for white and Hiarcs7.32 can see +4.39 >>>pawns for white. >>> >>>This is not because Fritz is smarter than Hiarcs but because of the fact that +2 >>>of Hiarcs is not identical to +2 of Fritz. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I see this all the time in games with my engine vs Crafty. For example in some >>drawn endings mine will say +2 and Crafty will say +1. >> >>Some engines contain a term that's supposed to induce them to trade down when >>ahead material, I think. >> >>bruce > >I agree that it is one of the reasons for Hiarcs's bigger score but not the only >reason. > >If black is a rook down in the initial position then hiarcs shows scores of >+6.xx when other programs show scores that are close to +5. > >Uri For Hiarcs, the value of a pawn is 1.28 instead of the conventional 1.00. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.