Author: Chessfun
Date: 05:23:18 11/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2000 at 05:38:37, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On November 11, 2000 at 20:53:26, K. Burcham wrote: > >>4 megs hash,1000 kns, 663 fritzmarks. >>48 megs hash, 971 kns, 676 fritzmarks. >>128 megs hash, 938 kns, 657 fritzmaks. >>184 megs hash, 913 kns, 639 fritzmarks. >>224 megs hash, 901 kns, 627 fritzmarks. >> >>i am constantly amazed by the humans that are able to play against this level of >>kns. what i see during most games with strong opponents, goes something like >>this, out of book it will start searching about 500-800 kns, and will climb >>guickly as pieces are removed from the game. in the endgame sometimes i will see >>between 1100-1500 kns, but i suspect these high numbers are just a fluctuation >>in the game software, and not a true kns. i dont know why this is this high >>compared to the fritzmark test with small hash. i built this gamer just to play >>at chess sites, so this type of information is very interesting to me. sarah >>what are your kns and fritzmarks. > > > >I'm not sure anyone cares but I'll throw in my Fritzmark for the heck of it :) > >48 megs hash, 1052knps, 727 fritmarks. > >Hardware used is a Celeron-2 566 @ 1065MHz (cpu at negative 20 degrees celsius >via a liquid cooled 72 watt peltier), Abit BE6-2 Motherboard, 192MB PC133 >Mushkin high perf rev. 2.0 ram and a RAID-0 array under Windows 2000 >Professional. My original point was that Thorsten's 606 was a fib. He don't have the cpu to produce such a mark last I knew he was only running 500 Mhz or something like that. With yours no doubt that score could be produced on that hardware !! Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.