Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:19:52 11/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2000 at 01:44:13, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 11, 2000 at 21:35:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 11, 2000 at 18:25:36, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>>Keep CCC on topic !! >>>> >>>>Alvaro >>> >>> >>>one bean .... two beans .... three beans ... >>> >>>accurate ! >>>it has to be accurate ! >>> >>>lets count again: >>> >>>one bean ... two beans ... three beans .... 4.6 beans .... >>> >>> >>>accurate ! we need more accurate results ! >>> >>>more ! gimme more ! >>> >>>accurate !! >>> >>>lets count again ! >> >> >>With an election to choose the president of the most powerful nation in >>the world, and with the totals so very close, accuracy is a good thing, >>regardless of the nonsense you spew here. You might want to generate a >>random number to choose the next president. We don't do that here... >>So prattle on... the process here is proceeding exactly as it should proceed, >>under the circumstances, slowly, with multiple checks. > >yes - you are absolutely right. >i could not resist. >the reason is that it reminds me on the discussions we had here ! >therefore the temptation to relate this "news" with computerchess-stuff >is big. > >i will try to not relate further since it seems to hurt some people, >i don't want to hurt people. here in germany we don't have this big >nationalism and therefore nobody is that proud of its country and >therefore the level of making fun about own country is IMO much bigger. >sorry. i will try to resist. You also don't have _near_ the same number of people. Counting 60 million of _anything_ is a _huge_ undertaking. With antique voting hardware in some locations, it is harder still.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.