Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 15:41:41 11/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2000 at 17:12:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 12, 2000 at 11:17:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>"recalibrate" is not what you are doing here. You once said it was "great" >>and now say it is "not", with respect to king safety. Just means one of those >>two opinions was wrong, because the program hasn't changed. > >ok. hiarcs7 has a king-safety problem. i told mark, but he said something >about that: maybe this is randomn in few samples. we have to wait >until more games have been played. Yep. That's exactly the answer I got too. >this is - what all programmers say. >if you are lucky they really work a month later on the problem. > >i guess mark has much NON-chess work. > >this is all long time ago. >that i do begin to forget it. It happens. For a week or so I thought that Gambit could score only 50% against H732 because of Hiarcs' "superior" king safety. Then I remembered that it is not superior at all. >i am getting old. Nah! :) Enrique >sorry.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.