Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:05:21 11/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2000 at 21:01:08, Howard Exner wrote: >On November 12, 2000 at 20:42:34, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On November 12, 2000 at 20:22:19, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>On November 12, 2000 at 15:11:08, Tania Devora wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>The program played very well in today game! >>>>Too, I think that the opening was very good for black. >>>> >>>>Congratulations! >>> >>>I followed most of the game on the Kasparov site and it looked like Fritz's eval >>>and Junior's differed significantly according to the commentators, who I think >>>are doing a great job - makes watching the game more enyoyable. The game >>>reminded of a typical computer vs human game but in reverse. That is, the >>>computer tossed its pieces towards the enemy king, while not bothering about the >>>loss of a pawn or two. That's how we all used to defeat computers in the past no >>>matter what our playing level. >> >>Is this a new version of Junior? > >It's described as an experimental version. Maybe Junior7 will offer two engines, >a main one and one with a more speculative approach. You mean, Christophe has changed the order of events in chess computing history, and others are following? Might Junior 7.00 etc. be very strong? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.