Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:12:41 11/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2000 at 16:37:26, Severi Salminen wrote:
>>[Event "60 10 "]
>>[Site "Christmas Tournament"]
>>[Date "2000.11.12"]
>>[Round ""]
>>[White "Gambit Tiger 1.0"]
>>[Black "Hiarcs 7.01"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[Opening "E59 Nimzo-Indian: 4.e3, Main Line"]
>>
>>{}
>>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 O-O 5.Bd3 d5 6.Nf3 c5 7.O-O Nc6 8.a3 Bxc3 9.bxc3
>>dxc4 10.Bxc4 Qc7 11.Be2 e5 12.d5 e4 13.Ne1 Ne5 14.f4 exf3 15.gxf3 Bh3 16.Ng2 Ng6
>>17.e4 Nh5 18.Qd2 Bxg2 19.Kxg2 Ngf4+ 20.Kh1 Qd7 21.Rg1 f5 22.Rb1 Nh3 23.e5 Nxg1
>>24.Kxg1 f4 25.e6 Qe7 26.Bd3 Rad8 27.c4 b6 28.Qc2 g6 29.Bb2 Ng7 30.Qc3 Rd6 31.Qe5
>>a6 32.h4 Rfd8 33.h5 gxh5 34.Rd1 Kf8 35.Rd2 Ke8 36.Qxg7 Qxg7+ 37.Bxg7 Ke7 38.Bh6
>>Rxd5 39.cxd5 Rxd5 40.Bxf4 b5 41.Bxh7 Rxd2 42.Bxd2 Kxe6 43.f4 Kf7 44.Bc3 Ke7
>>45.f5 1-0
>>
>>I am afraid I am a lousy analyst as I am too thrilled if I see a beautiful game
>>of chess . Is there another engine that will play 23. e5 !! and understand it is
>>winning ??
>
>Crafty 17.14 sees 23.e5 with score -0.17 (so it doesn't think it's winnig) at
>D=12.
>
>Severi
I havn't yet gone through the first game, but this game looks quite interesting!
23.e5, followed by winning the game looks quite astonishing, especially as
Hiarcs then gets into such a mess with no escape, some unclear moves later. But
the question is, did GT really see all these ideas, if not exact moves, at the
time of 23.e5? and was there really no defence which could have enabled atleast
a draw?
If this game is analytically sound, then I might even sugest that GT can play
some games as good as Kasparov (in his prime).
Then, if other positions, CT would play on that level, so, knowing which
engine to use when, would achieve the level of Kasparov in prime.
S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.