Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 18:26:17 11/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2000 at 21:09:49, stuart taylor wrote: >I think I understand now. >Well! that almost makes me want to cry! (together with an emotional Gambit >Tiger). An emotional and sympathetic chess program :o). That would be a new paradigm LOL. >You might say, "but it's not enough games to indicate very much"! Yep, that would be a strong argument as always. > But I can tell you, that I anyway am always upset to see a program which I >want to get for analysis, and main use, lose even one game, esp. to a previous >generation program, since that indicates some inadequacy somewhere, compared to >something else which is available. I would prefer if they were many draws, even >if only the occasional win. That would look more reliably better. But now, it >looks like in many ways, the old Junior6a is stronger than GT. Though I'm not fortunate enough to have GT in my possession I'm sure that it's a very strong and enjoyable program to use. Very few new programs sweeps the opposition aside without losses, because the differences in playing strength are rather small after all. So your choice boils down to preferences in features, GUI and style IMHO. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.