Author: stuart taylor
Date: 19:00:13 11/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2000 at 21:26:17, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 13, 2000 at 21:09:49, stuart taylor wrote: > >>I think I understand now. >>Well! that almost makes me want to cry! (together with an emotional Gambit >>Tiger). > >An emotional and sympathetic chess program :o). That would be a new paradigm >LOL. > >>You might say, "but it's not enough games to indicate very much"! > >Yep, that would be a strong argument as always. > >> But I can tell you, that I anyway am always upset to see a program which I >>want to get for analysis, and main use, lose even one game, esp. to a previous >>generation program, since that indicates some inadequacy somewhere, compared to >>something else which is available. I would prefer if they were many draws, even >>if only the occasional win. That would look more reliably better. But now, it >>looks like in many ways, the old Junior6a is stronger than GT. > >Though I'm not fortunate enough to have GT in my possession I'm sure that it's a >very strong and enjoyable program to use. Very few new programs sweeps the >opposition aside without losses, because the differences in playing strength are >rather small after all. So your choice boils down to preferences in features, >GUI and style IMHO. > >Mogens. I mean, only a rare loss. But maybe Chess Tiger will do much better against Junior, and for such a thrillng program as GT to come equal with Junior 6a and no worse against all others, maybe you need not be too upset if a very tough program can get through some small cracks. Let's see the humans do it, and the programs, against CHESS Tiger. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.