Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:49:19 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2000 at 21:09:49, stuart taylor wrote: >I think I understand now. thats always very good :-))) >Well! that almost makes me want to cry! (together with an emotional Gambit >Tiger). ?! >GT does not look anything special at all according to these results. 50% against Junior6a. So how will Junior want to beat GT in Elo-points ? >You might say, "but it's not enough games to indicate very much"! > But I can tell you, that I anyway am always upset to see a program which I >want to get for analysis, and main use, lose even one game, esp. to a previous >generation program, since that indicates some inadequacy somewhere, compared to >something else which is available. you are upset? why ? >I would prefer if they were many draws, even >if only the occasional win. That would look more reliably better. But now, it >looks like in many ways, the old Junior6a is stronger than GT. junior6a gets - if it is lucky, 50% against GT, Rebel-Tiger gets better results against Junior. But - IMO GT is the better program. i don't see why you are upset. its very normal that programs play different against different opponents. you have always ONE program that is a kind of fear-enemy. thats normal. >S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.