Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 03:15:18 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 05:52:28, Thorsten Czub wrote: >Which hype ? you claim something without showing any facts/evidence. That is not a claim. All the comments are present in the archives. Go take a look, you might actually learn something. Especially since you complained about advertising from unknown individuals. Or was it another CW idea adapted by you? Btw, your "new paradigm" rubbish was nothing but hype. Just for your information. >prove what you say or remain silent. That hasn't stopped you before, so why should it stop me now. A curious argument given the circumstances. Fortunately, the archives contain my proof. >if you stand to prove your claims. Very easily. >pah - the person that speculates are you. >we have had tiger for weeks. and we have alltogether collected so many >outoplayer games that WE have facts. YOU speculate. you have nothing >than a bad feeling that you present here. It's not enough to claim that you have facts, so the comment was warranted. It might very well score better than 50% against most programs, but I'll leave the conclusions to SSDF. They're more trustworthy. >if you have evidence that proves your negative emotions, come with them. I'm feeling very positive today, so I can't prove my negative emotions. Sorry. Mogens.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.