Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 03:56:25 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 06:15:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 05:52:28, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>Which hype ? you claim something without showing any facts/evidence. > >That is not a claim. All the comments are present in the archives. Go take a >look, you might actually learn something. Especially since you complained about >advertising from unknown individuals. Or was it another CW idea adapted by you? > >Btw, your "new paradigm" rubbish was nothing but hype. Just for your >information. > >>prove what you say or remain silent. > >That hasn't stopped you before, so why should it stop me now. A curious argument >given the circumstances. Fortunately, the archives contain my proof. > >>if you stand to prove your claims. > >Very easily. > >>pah - the person that speculates are you. >>we have had tiger for weeks. and we have alltogether collected so many >>outoplayer games that WE have facts. YOU speculate. you have nothing >>than a bad feeling that you present here. > >It's not enough to claim that you have facts, so the comment was warranted. It >might very well score better than 50% against most programs, but I'll leave the >conclusions to SSDF. They're more trustworthy. > >>if you have evidence that proves your negative emotions, come with them. > >I'm feeling very positive today, so I can't prove my negative emotions. Sorry. > >Mogens. Seems like you already done that, Mogens... Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.