Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:18:27 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 07:03:43, pavel wrote: >they are not "second-best" how do you know ? you don't have tiger, as you said yourself. what you say is speculation. nothing against speculation and opinion. nice. but i do prefer facts. >they ARE the BEST. ?!? best user interface and marketing ? what do you mean with BEST ? >if DF is even 50elo better than the previous version, then what you are >suggesting is best (GT or CT), will fall back in the race again. ?? df ?? i don't think that DF (dirk frickenschmidt or Deep Fritz ?! :-))) is better than GT. DF will get 50% against GT. overall GT is stronger. >right now, (comparing the programs that has been released only), CT is >'probably' the best, but you have to understand that CT is a new program compare >to fritz or junior. yes. you have to understand. >that is, ofcourse, if you want to make sense, other than say what you like to >say :) in opposite to you i have played the games ... >pavs. BTW: My name is Thorsten Czub and i am living in Germany. What is your full name and where do YOU come from ? Thank you.
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.