Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 04:22:58 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 07:18:27, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 07:03:43, pavel wrote: >>they are not "second-best" > >how do you know ? you don't have tiger, as you said yourself. >what you say is speculation. nothing against speculation and >opinion. nice. but i do prefer facts. > > >>they ARE the BEST. > >?!? best user interface and marketing ? >what do you mean with BEST ? > >>if DF is even 50elo better than the previous version, then what you are >>suggesting is best (GT or CT), will fall back in the race again. > >?? df ?? i don't think that DF (dirk frickenschmidt or Deep Fritz ?! :-))) > >is better than GT. >DF will get 50% against GT. > >overall GT is stronger. No, Gambit is not stronger than Deep Fritz. Besides, you don't even have Deep Fritz, so your statement is based on nothing. But if you like talking about paradigms instead of "bean counting", you shouldn't become a bean counter yourself. Enrique >>right now, (comparing the programs that has been released only), CT is >>'probably' the best, but you have to understand that CT is a new program compare >>to fritz or junior. > >yes. you have to understand. > > >>that is, ofcourse, if you want to make sense, other than say what you like to >>say :) > >in opposite to you i have played the games ... > >>pavs. > >BTW: My name is Thorsten Czub and i am living in Germany. >What is your full name and where do YOU come from ? > >Thank you.
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.