Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:25:08 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 06:15:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: >That is not a claim. All the comments are present in the archives. Go take a >look, you might actually learn something. Especially since you complained about >advertising from unknown individuals. Or was it another CW idea adapted by you? I am willing to learn anything. YOU claim a hype. there was none. show evidence that GT or RT is weaker than what the beta-testers said, and i will except this. your CLAIM from hear said has no weight for me , since i know that you have nothing else. >Btw, your "new paradigm" rubbish was nothing but hype. Just for your >information. i am different opinion. but i see what you call hype. hype is anything you don't know about. of course then it seems 80 % of the facts i know is hype for you. sorry. this way we cannot discuss about hype of course. > Fortunately, the archives contain my proof. all the archives contain is your offending posts against people of this group. you have no data and piss on the people. thats not exactly what i would call computerchess. maybe you should go into a wrestling newsgroup. or drink some tee. that is a good thing civilized people do in the day-time. >It's not enough to claim that you have facts, so the comment was warranted. It >might very well score better than 50% against most programs, but I'll leave the >conclusions to SSDF. They're more trustworthy. :-)))) yes - the ssdf were ALWAYS trustworthy ! :-)))) hype hype hype :-))) thats the level of your statements !
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.