Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 04:56:08 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 07:11:45, Thorsten Czub wrote: >no - it isn't. it is state of the art old paradigm. This also means that Gambit Tiger is state of the art old paradigm, since it's identical with Tiger 13.0 besides a few more or less advanced extensions and parametric changes. >does the new paradigm has to be stronger in results than the old paradigm ? >don't you realize that it is christophes FIRST effort, version 1.0 ? >RT is version 13 ! When you consider that Gambit Tiger is built on the framework of Tiger 13.0 your statement isn't correct. You can't derive anything from the version numbers. >wait until gambit-tiger is version 13 and i am sure junior will not anymore >be a problem. At least not Junior6a :o). >What do you want to test ? old paradigm programs are on the market for years. >new paradigm programs are rare. Either they're non existant or very common. That depends on varying definitions from week to week. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.