Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 05:37:14 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
>>now dont tell CT is also the result of "new paradigm" > >no - it isn't. it is state of the art old paradigm. Oh please, stop this "new paradigm" stuff! What is a new paradigm, how can _you_ say GT is new paradigm and CT is not, did you write those? Have you seen their sources? If the author says that he has implemented a totally new concept and tells us what it is, then we have something to talk about. If the author has a good chess playing program and then releases another based on that, which plays a little different, why would you raise such a hype about it? Have you ever programmed a chess program? Do you know how they actually work? >does the new paradigm has to be stronger in results than the old paradigm ? >don't you realize that it is christophes FIRST effort, version 1.0 ? >RT is version 13 ! >wait until gambit-tiger is version 13 and i am sure junior will not anymore >be a problem. Hey, my program is now version number 27.001, so it must be better than CT13 and _a lot_ better that GT1.0...oh, I just added bishop move generation routine which almost works - let's make it a round 30.0!! What a Brand New Paradigm... Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.