Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 06:09:30 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 09:04:52, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 08:30:42, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>Hi Mogens, > >Hi Enrique, > >>I know it is a difficult thing to ask, but please try to differenciate between >>the messenger and the program, so your understandable and shared irritation >>doesn't affect your idea of poor innocent Gambit. With friends like this who >>needs enemies, isn't it. But Gambit is strong and plays fun and interesting >>games. > >I haven't said anything derogatory about Gambit Tiger, written that it isn't >worthy of purchase or recommended another product. On the contrary, in my >initial reply to the comment by Stuart Taylor I wrote that buying the most >interesting program according to your own preferences is more important than a >few rating points. > >Gambit Tiger is undoubtedly strong, interesting and fun to play and watch. But I >oppose the unsubstantiated babble by certain individuals as I gather you do as >well. So if it sounds like I'm bashing Rebel you must have misunderstood my >messages. It doesn't sound like you are bashing Rebel 11, but you might be tempted to. This was my only point. The fact that you managed to stay objective deserves a lot of credit. Enrique >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.