Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 06:21:10 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 08:33:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: >no. you are wrong. Nope, I suggest you read some of the messages posted by Christophe Theron. A figment of your imagination isn't reality. >did you program gambit-tiger ? Not that I know. Did you? >i see what is. you guess what is. thats the difference mogens. I'm just referring to the words of the programmer posted at this very forum. >this is computerchess. and RT and GT are different programs and >play different. they get different results. Yes, but that is irrelevant in this context. There's nothing extraordinary about difference. >christophesn work on new paradigm has just begon. >he will continue to do so. >he said he has to overthink all (or most) he new about computerchess, >because of the gambit-tiger experience. >he also said he sees now parts of chris whittingtons comments in a different >light. He might very well construct something revolutionary. Some of his ideas revealed in a previous thread sounds very interesting. But Gambit Tiger is still an extension of Tiger 13.0. There's no conceptual change and that's a fact. >you have maybe 30 programs, and 3 or 4 of them are maybe new paradigm. They're all based on the same ideas as everyone else with minor alterations. All the programmers learn from mistakes and try (and listen to) new ideas whenever they can. Claiming that it's unique for CT displays immense ignorance and arrogance IMHO. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.