Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:33:20 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 07:22:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>On November 14, 2000 at 07:18:27, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On November 14, 2000 at 07:03:43, pavel wrote:
>>>they are not "second-best"
>>
>>how do you know ? you don't have tiger, as you said yourself.
>>what you say is speculation. nothing against speculation and
>>opinion. nice. but i do prefer facts.
>>
>>
>>>they ARE the BEST.
>>
>>?!? best user interface and marketing ?
>>what do you mean with BEST ?
>>
>>>if DF is even 50elo better than the previous version, then what you are
>>>suggesting is best (GT or CT), will fall back in the race again.
>>
>>?? df ?? i don't think that DF (dirk frickenschmidt or Deep Fritz ?! :-)))
>>
>>is better than GT.
>>DF will get 50% against GT.
>>
>>overall GT is stronger.
>
>No, Gambit is not stronger than Deep Fritz. Besides, you don't even have Deep
>Fritz, so your statement is based on nothing.
One question: I presume that Deep Fritz, much like Deep Junior, has a single CPU
version. Any idea on how it rates? I have no doubt DF will be a giant-killer but
I'd like to know it doesn't depend on twice the horsepower to accomplish this.
Albert
>
>But if you like talking about paradigms instead of "bean counting", you
>shouldn't become a bean counter yourself.
>
>Enrique
>
>>>right now, (comparing the programs that has been released only), CT is
>>>'probably' the best, but you have to understand that CT is a new program compare
>>>to fritz or junior.
>>
>>yes. you have to understand.
>>
>>
>>>that is, ofcourse, if you want to make sense, other than say what you like to
>>>say :)
>>
>>in opposite to you i have played the games ...
>>
>>>pavs.
>>
>>BTW: My name is Thorsten Czub and i am living in Germany.
>>What is your full name and where do YOU come from ?
>>
>>Thank you.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.