Author: stuart taylor
Date: 08:38:44 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 05:52:28, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 04:59:32, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>I think he meant to say that a 50% score for the old program Junior6a is a >>disapppointing result for the newcomer GT. A very reasonable reaction, so not >>rubbish at all. Especially given the hype from persons like you. > >Which hype ? you claim something without showing any facts/evidence. >prove what you say or remain silent. > >if you stand to prove your claims. > >>>It is well known that GT result with "only" 50% score is the worst GT reached, >>>all other opponents GT played better than 50%. >> >>That is not a well known fact, only speculation on your behalf so far. > >pah - the person that speculates are you. >we have had tiger for weeks. and we have alltogether collected so many >outoplayer games that WE have facts. YOU speculate. you have nothing >than a bad feeling that you present here. > >if you have evidence that proves your negative emotions, come with them. If you are discussing what I meaned, Junior looks if anything better than 50%, not only because it is the old program, but also because it had less games with white, and never lost a game as white, whereas GT did, twice. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.