Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:07:36 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 07:18:27, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 07:03:43, pavel wrote: >>they are not "second-best" > >how do you know ? you don't have tiger, as you said yourself. >what you say is speculation. nothing against speculation and >opinion. nice. but i do prefer facts. > > >>they ARE the BEST. > >?!? best user interface and marketing ? >what do you mean with BEST ? > >>if DF is even 50elo better than the previous version, then what you are >>suggesting is best (GT or CT), will fall back in the race again. > >?? df ?? i don't think that DF (dirk frickenschmidt or Deep Fritz ?! :-))) > >is better than GT. >DF will get 50% against GT. > >overall GT is stronger. Thorsten, you have two _serious_ problems. (1) you are prejudiced in which program(s) you think are better, regardless of what happens OTB. (2) your math is absolutely atrocious. If DF gets 50% against GT, then it is _impossible_ for GT to be "better overall". 50% would imply "equal". > > >>right now, (comparing the programs that has been released only), CT is >>'probably' the best, but you have to understand that CT is a new program compare >>to fritz or junior. > >yes. you have to understand. > > >>that is, ofcourse, if you want to make sense, other than say what you like to >>say :) > >in opposite to you i have played the games ... > >>pavs. > >BTW: My name is Thorsten Czub and i am living in Germany. >What is your full name and where do YOU come from ? > >Thank you.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.