Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 09:30:08 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 11:52:43, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 11:05:16, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On November 14, 2000 at 07:22:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>Hi Enrique, >> >>Only one real tournament so far to prove who is 'better': >> >>Dutch Open 2000: >> >>1. Gambit Tiger 10 out of 11 >>2. The King 8,5 >>3. Quest (= Deep Fritz) 8,0 >> >>Jeroen >> >> >>>No, Gambit is not stronger than Deep Fritz. Besides, you don't even have Deep >>>Fritz, so your statement is based on nothing. >>> >>>But if you like talking about paradigms instead of "bean counting", you >>>shouldn't become a bean counter yourself. >>> >>>Enrique > >Hi Jeroen, > >you are wrong. Quest was an experimental version of Fritz 7... Deep Fritz is >different. Besides, the number of the games renders any judgement about the >strength of the programs inconclusive. > >*** Djordje Not my logic. Rebel and Tiger were experimental programs to at the last WCCM. No reason to hide behind that. Furthermore (and nobody seems to notice?)... when was the last time Fritz won an important tournament? Fritz is great at SSDF, no doubt. Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.