Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:32:10 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 10:09:28, Kees van Iersel wrote:
>I only want to show that computers can still loose games to persons who are
>much weaker. The difference is 761.
>How would kramnik perfome against a person with so much difference.
>Secondly if a computer would win everything who would be interested in seeing
>human versus machine games.
>
>
>[Event "ICC 3 3"]
>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>[Date "2000.11.13"]
>[Round "-"]
>[White "WICKER-MAN"]
>[Black "Rebel Tiger 13.0"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[ICCResult "Black checkmated"]
>[WhiteElo "1884"]
>[BlackElo "2645"]
>[Opening "Sicilian: Taimanov variation"]
>[ECO "B46"]
>[NIC "SI.39"]
>[Time "23:21:26"]
>[TimeControl "180+3"]
>
>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bc4 Qc7 7. Bb3 b5 8.
>a3 Nf6 9. O-O Nxd4 10. Qxd4 Bd6 11. h3 Bh2+ 12. Kh1 Be5 13. Qe3 Bxc3 14.
>bxc3 Bb7 15. f3 O-O 16. a4 d5 17. e5 Nd7 18. f4 bxa4 19. Rxa4 Bc6 20. Ra1
>Bb5 21. Rf3 a5 22. Ba3 Rfc8 23. Bd6 Qb7 24. f5 a4 25. Ba2 Bc4 26. Bxc4 Rxc4
>27. f6 Qb2 28. Qg5 Qxa1+ 29. Kh2 Qh1+ 30. Kxh1 Nxf6 31. exf6 Rg4 32. hxg4 g6
>33. Qh6 a3 34. Qg7# {Black checkmated} 1-0
Kees, in the two examples you have shown today, it seems obvious to me that you
should have played Gambit Tiger instead.
Gambit Tiger would probably not allow you to play this way, and it might
actually turn out that it would be able to kill you in the very same way you
killed his brother Chess Tiger.
Gambit Tiger has more knowledge about king attacks than Chess Tiger.
Unfortunately I did not have enough time to add all of this knowledge in Chess
Tiger, and what has been added in Gambit Tiger is still not completely well
tuned.
But Gambit Tiger would have been a more interesting opponent for you.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.