Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 10:34:16 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 12:30:08, Ed Schröder wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 11:52:43, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>On November 14, 2000 at 11:05:16, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >> >>>On November 14, 2000 at 07:22:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>Hi Enrique, >>> >>>Only one real tournament so far to prove who is 'better': >>> >>>Dutch Open 2000: >>> >>>1. Gambit Tiger 10 out of 11 >>>2. The King 8,5 >>>3. Quest (= Deep Fritz) 8,0 >>> >>>Jeroen >>> >>> >>>>No, Gambit is not stronger than Deep Fritz. Besides, you don't even have Deep >>>>Fritz, so your statement is based on nothing. >>>> >>>>But if you like talking about paradigms instead of "bean counting", you >>>>shouldn't become a bean counter yourself. >>>> >>>>Enrique >> >>Hi Jeroen, >> >>you are wrong. Quest was an experimental version of Fritz 7... Deep Fritz is >>different. Besides, the number of the games renders any judgement about the >>strength of the programs inconclusive. >> >>*** Djordje > >Not my logic. Rebel and Tiger were experimental programs to at the last >WCCM. No reason to hide behind that. > >Furthermore (and nobody seems to notice?)... when was the last time >Fritz won an important tournament? Fritz is great at SSDF, no doubt. > >Ed Come on... Fritz won the WCCC in Hong Kong. Which other programs since won a WCCC except Junior and Shredder? Besides, the show off Deep Fritz - van der Wiel a month ago and the current games at KC have some meaning too. And yes, Fritz has been dominating the SSDF list for almost 3 years now. All together, comp-comp and human-comp, is quite impressive. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.