Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 11:48:41 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 14:35:40, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 14:17:27, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>I have and like Century 3, Gambit and Tiger, and I also like Deep Fritz and >>Shredder 4.x and others. And-And-And. Why should it be and/or? Why is it >>necessary for some to shoot at other programs in order to praise the oh so great >>chosen one? > >Your viewpoint is very consistant with the one that I have on this subject. >There's a lot of enjoyable programs, whether they be strong, weak, commercial or >free, available for the open minded. Fixating your belief and devotion to a >single program and proclaim it to be the chosen one is a very narrow minded >approach IMHO. There's more than one program for everyone's taste if one care to >look. > >>As for Fritz, doubting its competence either in its GUI or in its ability to >>play strong chess is, in my opinion, on the verge of the grotesque. For other >>opinions, one could check Anand's, for instance, who has been quite explicit. > >What did Anand say about Fritz? > >Mogens. I didn't save his comment, but I remember that Anand praised Fritz highly. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.