Author: Côme
Date: 12:08:50 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 13:11:02, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 13:00:53, Alvaro Rodriguez wrote: > >>On November 14, 2000 at 12:54:00, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On November 14, 2000 at 12:18:05, Peter Skinner wrote: >>> >>>>After move 18 there is _no_ improvement. I have no doubts about wicker-man being >>>>a computer. >>>> >>>>Being rated on ICC at 1800 is like being rated about 1400-1500 on FICS. There is >>>>almost no possible way for that type player to beat todays programs. I would >>>>inform speedtrap of his actions. >>> >>>That's a very speculative foundation for reporting another player. If he did the >>>same against human opposition, his rating probably wouldn't be as low as it is. >>>Besides, what's the big deal in cheating on a computer program. >>> >>>Mogens. >> >>It´s a big deal because the program expects to play a human opponent and when >>the person who is running the (C)(in this case Rebel Tiger) analyzes the games >>played against humans, he will analyze this game too and import it to a database >>with all human opponents. So, he will get wrong results.. Allthough, it´s just >>one game but if everybody cheats, then the results against humans will be >>completly worthless. IMO >> >>Alvaro > > >If you play 1800-level players on ICC, FICS or chess.net, this is just a fact >of life. You _are_ going to play computer cheaters. There are far more >cheaters at the lower ratings (there are also far more players down there too, >of course). > >It is a huge problem... Hello ! Wrong again I think. How is it possible to have 1800 if you cheat with a computer ? If you cheat you have a much higer rating. Best Regards Alexandre Côme
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.