Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 12:14:38 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 11:52:43, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: Hi Djordje, Quest played on a Dual machine, so it was in fact a version of Deep Fritz. It used 2 processors, didn't it? As you can see, I wrote 'better' in the sentence below to point out some irony. I think a discussion about this is pretty useless. One doesn't have Deep Fritz, the other doesn't own Tiger. Still, a lot of opinions are made without any proof. In Leiden Tiger won the tournament 2 points ahead of (Deep?) Fritz. In Leiden Gambit played the best chess of all. In Leiden Tiger was indeed better than Fritz. But based on only 11 games. So it doesn't say much. Only that Tiger won this important tournament :-) Jeroen >>Only one real tournament so far to prove who is 'better': >Hi Jeroen, > >you are wrong. Quest was an experimental version of Fritz 7... Deep Fritz is >different. Besides, the number of the games renders any judgement about the >strength of the programs inconclusive. > >*** Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.