Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 12:23:02 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 15:11:22, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 13:28:56, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>Eleven games are not more proof than the WCCC, where Fritz finished ahead of >>Tiger, > >what do you talk about ? Tiger. Read again. >GT was not invented / ready at london. Right. That's why I mentioned Tiger. Read again. >> and Gambit and Tiger are similar in strength. > >aha. suddenly they are similar. first RT is stronger now suddenly GT is similar According to most in the beta group, they are too close to know for sure. Some suspect that Tiger is stronger. Maybe. >>So I prefer to trust my own >>games, over 300 with Gambit and over 300 with Deep Fritz. On single CPU machines >>Gambit is not stronger. > >as i said: shredder5 gets 50% and you df gets 50%. >But they don't get the high results against others as GT gets, and also >they do not play such a new paradigm chess. Deep Fritz gets these very high results. 50% against Tiger and Gambit, beating all the rest of the cream of the crop, often by quite a lot. Which version of Deep Fritz do you have? What are your results? Can you post the games? Enrique
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.