Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 12:35:11 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 09:21:10, Mogens Larsen wrote: >Yes, but that is irrelevant in this context. There's nothing extraordinary about >difference. untrue. >He might very well construct something revolutionary. Some of his ideas revealed >in a previous thread sounds very interesting. But Gambit Tiger is still an >extension of Tiger 13.0. There's no conceptual change and that's a fact. not a fact. YOUR kind of fact = untrue claims. >They're all based on the same ideas as everyone else with minor alterations. All >the programmers learn from mistakes and try (and listen to) new ideas whenever >they can. Claiming that it's unique for CT displays immense ignorance and >arrogance IMHO. the arrogance is coming from your side.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.