Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:37:13 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 16:17:34, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >Which data? There are many pieces of information. Let's start with some of the >most recent that come to mind immediately: > >In the last WCCC played in London a few months ago, Shredder and Fritz finished >ahead and were the only two that didn't lose a game, in spite of being the only >ones, together with Nimzo, that didn't play against the 2 weak programs. Fritz >ended up second, half a point behind Shredder. All other programs did worse. >Does this mean to you that Junior and Century and Tiger are weaker? Obviously >not proven, given the few games played. So when in other tournaments consisting >of few games Fritz finishes behind some others the result is equally meaningful, >or equally meaningless. > >We all know what van der Wiel means to computer programs. Deep Fritz won against >him 3-1, +2 -2, without losing a game. Take a look at what is going on right now >at KC. And before, Fritz' PR at the Dutch Championship was 2600, not counting >the boycott games. Now, all this must have a meaning regarding Fritz' ability to >play chess, a meaning that has little to do with your account of its failed >performance in recent years. And please notice that I am only mentioning >manually played games. > >And yes, Fritz dominates clearly the SSDF list, the very best comp-comp >reference there is. I am not at all surprised. > >Enrique hyper hyper enrique. looks pretty much biased to me. :-))) i don't see that fritz is leading anything. maybe one day it will win a championship. but only when all others do not participate.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.