Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Junior6a - Gambit-Tiger, PGN's

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 16:33:24 11/14/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 14, 2000 at 18:02:28, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On November 14, 2000 at 16:29:17, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>I don't think that's fair to the beta-testers. They (just like you) are
>>computer chess enthousiatics with a long history of knowledge on ALL
>>programs. I am sure you would write a positive review on a program if
>>you like it.
>
>That's probably true. I didn't claim that I would react differently or do better
>if placed in a similar position.

>But if Gambit Soft asked me to make a review of Gandalf I would
>say no, because chances are that I might not be entirely
>objective.

You can not be blamed liking a program. Objective vs Subjective. Nobody
is objective once you fall in love with a program and I don't see any
bad in that as long as you were objective and reserved before the program
came.


>I would rather answer specific questions instead.

Missed chance? I hear Gandalf is good. Why not write about it?


>>That's about all there is to say about it because that's
>>the way it goes since Rebel8 times.
>
>That's okay with me but you asked me what I implied. Basically, it's the
>"review" title I dislike. By my understanding a review is an objective analysis
>of a given product, listing and estimating strengths and weaknesses, by an
>independent individual. If it's from a person within the team then it's "just" a
>personal opinion or impression, however objective that person might attempt to
>be. In my opinion it's enevitable that an internal reviewer becomes attached to
>the product in some way, making the estimation subjective.

Not true. Note that many of the Rebel beta-testers a) also beta-test other
programs b) are as positive on other products as well.

Also you forget a main important point, from the beginning we (Christophe
and I) have told the beta-team: no secrecy you can write about the beta's
in public forums. That is quite risky don't you think? What if Rebel 11.0
would have been a product they disliked? And if a review comes in I dislike
it will be published too. Beta-testers have the freedom to include their
dislikes as a matter of fact I have pointed to an old review of Rebel8 at:

http://www.rebel.nl/barry.htm

and write it in this form, including a "dislike list". But the beta-testers
go their own way and I am not going to censor them.

Ed




>Mogens.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.