Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 15:26:13 01/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 1998 at 18:09:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 09, 1998 at 17:52:51, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >> >>On January 09, 1998 at 14:41:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>classic position, although it might have a cook in Qg8 as well. >>>Crafty finds Qg7 in 3 secs... but later changes to Qg8, but never >>>sees a mate in a minute or so, but both moves have an eval of over >>>+12, which crafty gets at 8 plies, 3 seconds... >> >>Wow, this totally smokes me. >> >>I don't know what Qg8 is about though. I have a hard time seeing the >>mate after Kxg8, and I somehow doubt you solved this one positionally >>:-) >> >>bruce > >I may have blown this. I re-ran it and did not get either qg8 or Qg7 >quickly. It is possible I mis-typed it when I set it up... > >Bob It is still a mate in 7 ...but it took crafty almost 10 minutes the way it was typed in..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.