Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 19:31:50 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 07:49:10, Uri Blass wrote:
>On November 14, 2000 at 07:01:29, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On November 14, 2000 at 04:03:10, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>If you use this time control Junior and Fritz are going to be clearly weaker
>>>than programs that knows to use their time correctly.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>are you joking ?
>>what is the difference in usage between 40/40 and 60/60 ????
>>
>>clever time management is important for chess programs. if it makes
>>the program stronger , they should program it.
>
>There is a difference because in 60/60 you should use slightly more time in the
>opening.
>
>I agree that programmers should program it but the fact is that most of them did
>not do it.
>40/40 is more similiar to the ssdf than 60/60.
>
>The difference is only small difference and you can see a big difference if you
>compare Hiarcs's results in 40/40 and Hiarcs's results in 200/200
>
>Hiarcs is going to get better results in 200/200 because other programs will not
>use time in intelligent way in this case.
>
>Uri
I understand your point about 200/200. However this kind of time controls are
seldomly used...
I'm not sure I care much if somebody shows me it can beat my program by setting
up a game at 1000/10 time control.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.